Mission College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Unapproved Minutes
Thursday, December 6, 2001
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:12 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Bell-Cheung (Ext.5385) AAS |
X |
|
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5349) Tech |
X |
|
|
Cochran (Ext. 5176) Stud Dev |
|
X |
McGee (Ext. 5042) Stud Dev |
|
X |
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
McKean
(Ext. 5326) Math |
X |
|
|
Guich (Ext. 5270) SocSci |
|
X |
Moore (Ext. 5382) AAS |
X |
|
|
Jackins (Ext.5322 ) Math |
X |
|
Myint (Ext. 5316) ESL |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
|
X |
Patton
(Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5413) AF/CIT |
X |
|
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
Other:
B.Grayson (Staff Dev), |
|
X |
ASB:
C.Vincenz, P.Le |
|
X |
|
C. Toppel (Inst’l Tech Comm) |
|
X |
Guests:
D.Cordero |
|
X |
|
Division
Chairs |
A |
P |
Division Chairs |
A |
P |
|
Akers-Martin (Comm) |
|
X |
Cowels
(AAS) |
|
X |
|
Burrell (Natural
Science) |
X |
|
Delongchamps (CATA) |
|
X |
|
Callaway (VP Instruction) |
|
X |
Dinger (Commercial Services) |
|
X |
|
Chandler (Social Science) |
|
X |
Lowenberg (ESL) |
|
X |
|
Chan, R. (Student Services) |
|
X |
Xiques
(Technology) |
|
X |
|
Chiang (Math) |
X |
|
|
|
|
II. Order
of the Agenda
The Senators agreed, by consensus, to accommodate
guests if necessary.
III. Oral Communication from
the Public
Don
Cordero announced that he has been attending the IMPAC sessions and encouraged
all content area faculty to attend the upcoming meetings: 1) Fresno on December
15, 2001, and 2) Sacramento on January 5, 2002. Senator Lynne noted that the meetings are extremely
interesting and worthwhile, and the organization covers all expenses as
well. For additional information,
check the web site www.academicsenate.cc.ca.us under IMPAC.
Senator
Johnson reported that a 25th anniversary school-wide celebration is
in the development stage and will feature students and faculty performing arts
and has been tentatively scheduled for late April. All interested in contributing to or participating in the
event are welcome and should contact Keith.
VII. Old
Business
A. Review and Consider Approval of Division Chair
Council’s (DCC) Recommendation for Faculty Hires
Jane explained the process, noting that the senators met with their division chairs after the joint Senate/DCC meeting held November 29, 2001. The division chairs ranked the positions and the office of instruction tallied the results, which were discussed at the DCC meeting on Monday, December 3, 2001. The next step is for the Senate to review the ranked positions, and, if the senate agrees with the prioritized list, a recommendation will be forwarded to the college president on behalf of the DCC and the MCAS.
Lee pointed out that the DCC opted to rank all 21 positions, and because it appears that there will only be funding for nine positions, the DC’s focused on the top ten positions. It is possible, depending on the state budget, that 3 or 4 additional positions may be funded. The DCC felt that if more positions are possible, or other changes such as resignations, retirements, or the like occur, the DCC will review the remaining positions. She urged the Senators to approve the submitted list. Lee noted that Manufacturing, in the tenth position, currently has a temporary person assigned for one semester. If funding is made available for additional positions or something shifts within the department, Manufacturing may be granted an additional semester for the temporary position.
There was discussion on the ranked list, and several senators applauded the process and acknowledged the balance of positions across the curriculum/college in the ranked selection. There were brief discussions from senators that were disappointed that their department’s requests were ranked lower than anticipated, and Lee provided a brief explanation of the rationales involved. The discussion then focused on the process that would take place if additional positions are granted by the district. It was agreed that the DCC will review the list in light of any changes that might have occurred during the time span, and the results of their deliberations will be brought to the MC Academic Senate for consideration. This would be consistent with the process now in place and would allow for both bodies to respond to the needs of the college at the time.
The Senators unanimously passed the following motion (M/S/U – VanTassel/Myint):
“that the Mission College Academic Senate approves the prioritized list of new faculty hires as submitted by the Division Chair Council.”
The top nine ranked positions are as follows:
#1. Computer Applications
#2. Counselor – Spanish Literate
#3. English
#4. General Business
#5. Mathematics
#6. Health Occupations
#7. Communication Studies
#8. ESL
#9. Foreign Language
V. Approval of the Minutes
The
minutes for November 8, 2001, were accepted and approved as submitted (M/S/P
– VanTassel/Mancini)
The
minutes for November 15, 2001, were accepted and approved as submitted (M/S/P
– McGee/Mancini)
The
minutes for November 29, 2001, were accepted and approved with a correction to
the Roll Call:
Rosalyn
Chan was present at the meeting (M/S/U – Estrada/Lynne).
VI. Information
& Announcements
1. Jane
advised the Senators that the Child Development Proposal, first presented to
the MC Academic Senate in March 2001, will be considered for approval at a
special meeting of the Academic Senate called for Thursday, December 13, 2001,
from 2:00 p.m. to 2:30 p.m. in Campus Center Room 219/20. The Senators were provided with a copy
of the proposal, which was deferred to this semester at the request of the
Division Chair Council. The process
was discussed briefly at this time, and the senators agreed that the issue is
one of importance that requires a special meeting. Senator Cochran requested that the Senators review the
proposal keeping in mind that there are two separate entities involved: (1) the Child Development Center which
is the lab site for (2) the Child Development Department. It is anticipated that the Child
Development Center will be self-sustaining in the near future; Intel and
Packard have assisted in the completion of the building. There is a commitment to the program
through the community, industry, faculty and staff. Jane and Lin will address the DCC on Monday, December 10,
2001, to affirm that their concerns have been resolved and to discuss process.
2. Jane reported that Carolyn Fisher
has advised that ACE is dealing with the issues concerning faculty safety and
working conditions relative to Concurrent Enrollment.
3. The District Academic Senate meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, January 31, 2001, at the Maywood Park Building in Santa Clara, from 2:00 – 4:00 p.m. Specifics on the location will be provided with the agenda.
VI. Administrative
Business/Actions/Appointments
A. Curriculum
Committee – No curriculum
report was presented at today’s meeting.
B. Staff
Recognition - Jonathan and Jane will present Hozie
with the Senate’s resolution next week.
C. Committee
Appointments – Senator McGee
has advised that the Student Services Division has affirmed its request to
appoint Lydia Harris as its representative on the Instructional Program Review
Committee. Jane asked for
direction. The Senators
unanimously passed the following motion (M/S/U Johnson/Sippel):
“that
the Mission College Academic Senate approves the appointment of Lydia Harris as
the Student Services Division’s representative to the Instructional
Program Review Committee as a faculty emeritus representative under special
circumstances per the division’s request.”
D. Oral Reports
1. Staff Development – Betty Grayson presented a recommendation to
the Academic Senate for consideration relative to the academic calendar. She recommends that the flex day
scheduled for August be deleted and replaced by a flex day scheduled the day
before Thanksgiving. This would
necessarily require that final exams begin one day earlier, on a
Wednesday. She asked the Senators
to discuss the proposal with their constituents.
2. Datatel Implementation Committee – Senator McKean submitted the following
report:
* There were reports of difficulties encountered in running the Staff Data
MIS, the adjustments made by hand and how the problem is being addressed. The problem is not unique to MC, and
folks are attempting to remedy the situation before entering in Fall and Summer
02 staff data (March 02). * A
pilot/prototype group is being established to determine guidelines for
prioritizing the many tasks that come before IS. Reps are to be from both campuses and IS and are being
selected by Fred Chow and Mina Jahan.
* WebAdvisor is up and running with the exception of
credit card feature. Both campuses
have elected to continue to make available to the public our schedules since
WebAdvisor doesn’t include course descriptions. * There was a review and discussion of
the proposed restructuring of the District-wide Information (IT) Committee with
its various subcommittees. Sumi
emphasized that end-users of
Datatel needed to be included in the representation, and that on one of the
subcommittees, Mission wasn’t even represented. A MC representative (from the Office of Instruction)
is to be added to that subcommittee.
* The IT committee is quite large (14), so to keep the
number from growing, representation in some areas will be toggled between the
two campuses. Representatives are
from administration, district and the two campuses, and every effort will be
made to balance the representation between MC and WVC. The presidents will coordinate the
membership between the colleges considering availability and balance of representation.
* The
Senate’s task:
1. Are the Senates at the two colleges comfortable with sharing the representation for a year at a time?
2. After the
presidents have decided on the other members and balance of representation
between the colleges is reviewed, should it be MC’s turn to provide a
representative, do we have someone who is willing to sit on the committee to
represent the Senate?
* Other
info: Chris Olson reported that
there was a misconception on the part of ACE about using our SSN’s for
access to the student information reports through PARIS or Datatel. Once they understood that it was only
the last four digits that would be used, they seemed willing to go
forward. This would make it much
easier for faculty as they would not need to learn their new id numbers before
accessing student information for classes.
3. Instructional Technology Committee - The senators were asked to consider
approval of Web Publishing Guidelines developed by the committee. Carol explained that these guidelines
are intended to provide the best practices for creating web pages for Mission
College web sites. The Senators
unanimously approved the document as submitted (M/S/U –
Lynne/Sippel). Jane asked Carol to
thank those that participated in the development of the document on behalf of
the Senate.
4. Other: None
IV. Old
Business (Continued)
B. Consider
Resolution re: Decision re: Flags in Classrooms
Jane
advised the Senators that the Trustee who had initiated the proposal for flags
in the classroom announced at the last Board meeting that he will not pursue
the matter further.
The
following resolution was presented to the Senate for consideration:
“Whereas,
Mission College mourns the losses
suffered during the September 11th attack, and its aftermath; and
Whereas,
Mission College has demonstrated its
patriotism and support through educational forums, flying the flag at
half-mast, ceremonies, class and workplace discussions, moments of silence,
erecting memorial and observance sites, collecting donations and encouraging a broad and continuing dialogue; and
Whereas, The Mission College Academic Senate has issued a resolution addressing
the need for dialogue, tolerance, freedom and civil rights on our campus;
Therefore,
Be It Resolved, That the Mission
College Academic Senate proclaims its support for the soldiers and their
families involved in the conflict, all those who suffer from the repercussions
of terrorism and war, the basic rights and liberties for which the United
States was formed and continues to stand, the right to form and peacefully
articulate differing opinions through our constitutionally protected freedom of
speech, and the right to express and demonstrate our patriotism and support
through numerous and varied approaches, and in numerous and varied
forums.”
Discussion
ensued on whether or not the Senate should take further action on this
matter. The ASB representative,
Phuc Le, indicated that there is concern about this issue among the students
and felt a need to pursue the matter.
Several Senators spoke to the issue, some stating their concern about
enflaming the issue. Others expressed their support for the resolution, stating
that as an institution of education, it is important to respond in an
educational manner and do what educators are supposed to do. The resolution states it best. It is also important that the actions
taken by the Senate, the faculty, and the students since September 11th
be acknowledged and recognized for their educational and moral value. It was
also reported that lessons have been altered to allow for discussion and is
evident in classroom assignments.
The
above resolution was passed unanimously (M/S/U – Brennan/Cochranl).
Due to the late hour, the remaining
business items were postponed to the first meeting in January.
X. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
Publications/Minutes
1. The
summary notes for the October 24, 2001, and the November 28, 2001, meeting of
GAP.
2. The minutes and agenda for the
November 28, 2001, meeting of DBAC.
3. The agenda for the December 5,
2001, meeting of the District Council.
4. The minutes for the November 19,
2001, meeting of the MC CRC and the agenda for December 3, 2001..
5. The December 3, 2001, issue of FA
NEWS from the Foothill-DeAnza
Faculty Association.
6. The agenda for the November 29,
2001, Special Meeting of the WVMCCD Board of Trustees.
7. The agenda for the November 15,
2001, meeting of the Mission-West Valley Land Corporation.
Announcements/Conferences
1. The
January meeting of the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges
will be held at the Westin Hotel, San Francisco Airport on January 6-8,
2002. The January 6th
public session is open to any interested parties and will begin at 1:30
p.m. The public hearing on the
proposed new standards will start at 2:30 p.m.
2. A Call for Proposals has been
issued for the 13th Annual Economic Development Network Conference,
“California Diversity: The Global Competitive Edge,” will be held
at the Hilton Burbank Airport and Convention Center from April 15-17,
2001. There is particular interest
in sponsoring breakout sessions by business people. Proposals must be received by December 19, 2001. Additional information is available
from the Senate office or contact Nicole Sherman, ED>Net, sherman@ednet.cc.ca.us.
3. The 6th Annual History
Teaching Retreat will be held Friday, February 1, 2002, at El Camino
College. Guest Speaker will be
Lynn Hunt, President of the American Historical Association.
For
additional information, call: (310) 660-3735.
4. A Call for Presenters has been
issued for the 10th Annual Conference on Undergraduate Teaching and
Learning: Reuniting the Education Family, will be held on Friday, April 19,
2002, at El Camino Community College in Torrance, California. The forms for interested
presenters is available from the MC Academic Senate Office. Conference Registration forms will be
distributed in February 2002.
XI. Future
Agenda Items
No
new agenda items were presented at today’s meeting.
XII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:05 p.m. (M/S/U – Brennan/Sippel). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.