Mission
College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Approved
Minutes
Thursday,
November 14, 2002
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:10 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
McAlister (Ext. 5087) Stud.Dev. |
|
X |
|
Charland (Ext. 5046)
Stud. Dev. |
|
X |
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X
|
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
|
X |
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
|
X |
|
Guich (Ext. 5270) Social Sci. |
|
X |
Oliver (Ext. 5427) AAS |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
X |
|
Patton
(Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Rivas (Ext. 5282) CATA |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5717) AF/CIT |
|
X |
Rosner (Ext. 5317) ESL |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
Other: A.Braun (CRC), |
|
X |
Other: B.Grayson (Staff Dev) |
X |
|
|
S.Ghiya, S.
Hanna (ASB Rep.) |
|
X |
C.Toppel (Inst'l Tech) |
|
X |
|
Division
Chairs |
A |
P |
Division Chairs |
A |
P |
|
Chandler (Social Science) |
X |
|
Dinger (Comm Serv/Tech) |
|
X |
|
Chan, R. (Student Services) |
|
X |
Hacker (ESL) |
|
X |
|
Chiang (Math) |
|
X |
McKay (VP of Instruction) |
|
X |
|
Cowels (AAS) |
X |
|
Messerschmidt (Communctns) |
|
X |
|
Delongchamps (CATA) |
X |
|
Poe (Natural Science) |
X |
|
|
Guests |
A |
P |
Guests |
A |
P |
|
WS.Chiang, L.Harris, M. Jahan, |
|
X |
C.Monroe,C.Pembrook, J.Smith |
|
X |
II. Approval
of Minutes
The
minutes for the November 7, 2002, meeting were accepted and approved as
submitted (M/S/U - Mancini/Estrada).
III. Order of the Agenda
It was agreed (M/S/U - Charland/Mancini) that the
order of the agenda will be changed as follows:
Item
IX.D will follow Oral Communication, followed by Item V.A.
IV. Oral Communication from
the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today's meeting.
IX. New
Business
A. Discuss
Directions for Library Instruction
Judie
Smith advised that the Librarians are working hard to determine what direction Library
instruction should take, and it is important to have input from the campus
community. Currently the Library
staff offers traditional classes teaching basic research skills, how to use the
Internet, and orientation classes. She noted that the orientations are mostly driven by instruction;
they are subject specific and assignment driven. The staff is considering block orientations.
Many
Mission College students are ill equipped to do research, lacking basic
skills. The need for an
information competency requirement is clear, whether or not the state mandates
such a requirement. The E&FMP indicated
that the Library would work toward the development of instructional modules and
individual components that would be made available on the web. In addition, several workshops are
being considered. She asked the
Senators to discuss the matter with their constituents in order to provide
feedback to the Library staff.
Jane
acknowledged Judie's report as an introduction for further discussion on the
matter, and she requested that Judie prepare a one page summary for electronic distribution
to the Senators. Judie agreed and suggested
that a Library representative be invited to department and/or division meetings
to discuss the matter further. The
intent is to determine how to best meet the students' needs.
V. Joint
Meeting w Division Chair Council to Review Ranked List of New Faculty Positions
Last
week, the Academic Senate agreed to move ahead with the five automatic positions
to fill vacancies. The Senate also
approved the ranking of positions #1 through #17 on the prioritized list
presented by the Division Chair Council (DCC), and recommended that the
Assessment Coordinator position be 100% for assessment. It was agreed that the reprioritization
of positions #18 through #31 would be considered at today's meeting.
During
a very lengthy discussion, both Jane and Dianne explained that the process
practiced at Mission College allows for disparate views between the Senate and
the DCC. If the two bodies do not
reach consensus, the process allows for two separate recommendations to be sent
forward to the President, who will then make the final decision. The best
alternative is for the two bodies to reach consensus, and that is the intent of
today's meeting.
Several
options for ranking were presented, discussed at length, and seriously
considered. Several motions to approve
alternative rankings either were withdrawn or failed for compelling reasons. There was extensive discussion on
whether or not to even consider suggested changes without the full membership
of the DCC, and several questions were put to the entire group to ascertain if
there was consensus. It was clear
that consensus had not been reached as yet and discussion continued.
The
allotment of FTE for specific positions was discussed at length, as well as the
need to maintain the direction the college wishes to take when considering
positions. The intent of today's discussion was to determine if there were any
glaring errors in the prioritization list. It was noted that there are ranked positions that may be
affected by factors such as resignations, FTE allotments, etc. For example, the
PE position is dependent on the resignation of the instructor currently on
leave, the Communications Studies
position is dependent on the allotment of FTE by PGC, and there is not enough
FTE for the Political Science position.
It is understood that the rankings have been made with those issues considered.
It was suggested that the list be accepted as it was presented or throw it out
and begin again. Ultimately, the
following motion was presented (M/S - Sippel/Dooley):
"that
the Mission College Academic Senate adopt the priority list for positions #18
through #31 as it is."
Once
again, a lengthy discussion ensued, with many of the issues already considered
raised again. It was noted that Mission College is extremely fortunate in that
it has a good and fair process that has worked well over the years. The dialogue and debate that has taken place today is
appropriate and healthy. A call
for the question (M/S - Dooley/Lynne) passed and the above motion to accept the
list as presented passed.
The
remaining agenda items were postponed to the next Senate meeting.
XI. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
Publications/Minutes
1. A
copy of the first draft of the Mission College Strategic Plan for Instructional
and Administrative Technology.
2. The ASCCC Resolutions that were considered
at the Fall Plenary Session in November 2002, and the Appendices for use with
the resolutions.
3. The agenda for the November 20,
2002, meeting of DBAC.
4. The October 2002 issue of ACCREDITATION
NOTES from WASC.
5. The agenda for the November 13,
2002, meeting of GAP.
6. The agenda for the November 14,
2002, meeting of the MC Classified Senate.
Announcements/Conferences
1. ACE announced that an election will
be held in December for a council member to replace Carol Beck and serve a three year term. Those interested should contact Carolyn
Fisher.
XII. Future Agenda Items
No
items were added.
XIII. Adjournment
The
meeting was adjourned at 3:59 p.m.
(M/S/U - Oliver/McAlister) ).
These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.