Mission
College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Approved
Minutes
Thursday,
November 7, 2002
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:10 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
McAlister (Ext. 5087) Stud.Dev. |
|
X |
|
Charland (Ext. 5046)
Stud. Dev. |
|
X |
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
X |
|
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
|
X |
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
X |
|
|
Guich (Ext. 5270) Social Sci. |
X |
|
Oliver (Ext. 5427) AAS |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
X |
|
Patton
(Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Rivas (Ext. 5282) CATA |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5717) AF/CIT |
|
X |
Rosner (Ext. 5317) ESL |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
Other: A.Braun (CRC) |
|
X |
Other: B.Grayson (Staff Dev) |
|
X |
|
S. Hanna (ASB
Rep.) |
|
X |
S. Ghiya (ASB Rep) |
|
X |
|
Division
Chairs |
A |
P |
Division Chairs |
A |
P |
|
Chandler (Social Science) |
X |
|
Dinger (Comm Serv/Tech) |
|
X |
|
Chan, R. (Student Services) |
|
X |
Hacker (ESL) |
|
X |
|
Chiang (Math) |
X |
|
McKay (VP of Instruction) |
|
X |
|
Cowels (AAS) |
X |
|
Messerschmidt (Communctns) |
|
X |
|
Delongchamps (CATA) |
|
X |
Poe (Natural Science) |
X |
|
|
Guests |
A |
P |
Guests |
A |
P |
|
S.Bersola, W.S. Chiang, |
|
X |
L.Harris, M.Jahan |
|
X |
II. Approval
of Minutes
The
minutes for the October 24, 2002, meeting were accepted and approved as
submitted (M/S/U - VanTassel/Oliver).
The
following clarification from Carolyn Fisher for the minutes of the October 17,
2002, meeting was accepted (M/S/U - Van Tassel/Oliver):
Referring
to Page 3, third paragraph, last sentence: Carolyn explained that the reason West Valley College does
not have an inter-session is because the WVC administration does not have
enough FTE to support an inter-session.
Therefore, the item was pulled from the negotiation table.
III. Order of the Agenda
It was agreed (M/S/U - VanTassel/Rivas) that the
order of the agenda will be changed to accommodate Jody Hacker, and Item IX.A
will be addressed immediately following Item V.A.
IV. Oral
Communication from the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today’s meeting.
At
this time, it was agreed, by consensus, that Item VI will be addressed until
the Division Chairs arrive.
VI. Information &
Announcements (College & District)
1. Dianne McKay announced that a
meeting will be held at Mission College on November 19, 2002, in Conference
Room A (tentatively set for 1:30 p.m. or 2:00 p.m.), to begin discussions
jointly with West Valley College on early planning to seek a Title 3
grant. She explained that these
grants are federally funded at $300,000-$400,000 per year for five years and
are awarded based on the need for a major college improvement or change. The new accreditation standards involve
learning outcome assessment and creating a community of evidence. Dianne
advised that the recent WASC Accreditation for the next five years was awarded
under the old standards. There is a need to pay close attention
to the direction we need to go in to evaluate student success. If such a grant is obtained, strong and
knowledgeable faculty will need to participate in establishing the
outcomes. The consultant who
assisted the college with the last Title 3 grant will also attend the meeting,
and will potentially write the grant.
Jane reported that the State Academic Senate is very concerned about
some of the movement toward outcome measures and advised that faculty need to
be highly involved in decision-making.
2. Jane expressed her good wishes and
congratulations to Steve Kinsella on his appointment as President of Gavilan
College. She thanked him for his
service to Mission College.
3. Fred Prochaska has asked each
Senate to appoint a representative to the Innovation Fund Committee to review
the current innovation fund proposals during the first week of December. Jane was directed to put out a call for
an interested volunteer.
4. The
American Council on Education and AT&T Foundation (ACE/AT&T) have
joined to offer an award: Technology as a Tool for Internationalization. Jane was directed to determine if the
district/college is a member of ACE and, if so, to put out a call for
submissions.
5. Ian
Walton submitted a written report of his Statewide Academic Senate Activities
for October 2002, as follows:
There
are two faculty members on the Board of Governors, appointed by the Academic
Senate for California Community Colleges (ASCCC). They serve a two-year term and may be reappointed. Last October (2001) the ASCCC submitted
the names of Janis Perry, Linda Collins and Michael Anker for the position,
held by Pat Siever, that was due to expire in January 2002. The Governor has not made an
appointment from this list and Pat Siever continues to serve. This month, following their regular
nomination and interview process, the ASCCC submitted the names of Irene
Menegas, Janis Perry, Linda Collins, and Carolyn Russell for the position,
currently held by Irene Menegas, that is due to expire January 2003. Also on Saturday, October 12th,
Mission College played host to the first meeting of the Relations with Local
Senates standing committee of the ASCCC.
Ian chairs this committee, which includes two representatives of each of
the four Senate areas. The
visitors were impressed by the college's new facilities. The committee plans to meet here again,
as does the Occupational Education Committee chaired by Sharon Vogel.
The
order of the agenda was resumed.
V. Joint
Meeting w Division Chair Council to Review Ranked List of New Faculty
Positions
The
Senators received a prioritized list of positions as recommended by the
Division Chair Council. Some
Senators had indicated a need for background about WSCH/FTE. Jane explained WSCH/FTE for those who
were not familiar with the term and how it is defined. The Senate's role is to
consider the academic perspective jointly with the Division Chairs who deal
with WSCH/FTE on a regular basis.
It was explained that WSCH is defined as "weekly student contact
hours," and FTE refers to "full time equivalent" and is equal to
1.0. A department is assigned 1.0
FTE for each equivalent full time faculty person. The ratio is used to measure the efficiency of departments,
and the ratio varies from department to department. The district has a goal of 525 WSCH/FTE, which is determined
by a formula and is negotiable. The differential of ten increments is equal to
approximately $300,000.
Dianne
explained that the amount of money that comes into the district depends on how
many students are taught and the efficiency with which they are taught. When a ratio of 525 is set, we are
stating that, on average, each class will have 30 students. If the ratio is
raised, the number of students must be raised for every hour of
instruction. Each department has a
different WSCH/FTE goal and the enrollment management goal is to reach a total
of 525. It was noted that Jim
Burrell has given an excellent workshop on this matter during flex days. It was suggested that Jim be invited to
present the workshop to the Senate.
At this time, Jane turned the floor over to Dianne.
Dianne
thanked the Senators and the Division Chairs for their work in weighing the
data as prepared by the Office of Instruction. The Division Chair Council reviewed the list on Monday, and
she clarified that the number of faculty hires is based on growth,
resignations, and retirements. The
state has a formula for funding positions as the college grows. The state sets
the number and obligates the college to meet that number. This is a separate issue from the
goal of a 75/25 ratio of full-time to part-time faculty mandated by AB
1725. The college is currently
working to reach that goal, which is currently at approximately 65/35.
Dianne
continued, explaining that the state funds $55,000 for each full-time faculty
position. If the college does not
meet the state's obligatory number of faculty hires, the college loses $55,000
per position, but continues to teach sections with associate faculty at a cost
of $36,000. At this time, the
Board of Governors is considering waiving the colleges' obligation by 50%. If that is approved, Mission College
will be able to reduce its obligation of five positions to two positions. At this time concerns were expressed
relative to the approval of any hiring at this time, and it was suggested that
another meeting between the DCC and the MCAS be held to discuss the exact
number of hires. This discussion will be agendized for a future joint meeting.
It
was suggested that one way to reduce the ratio is to reduce the number of
associate faculty. Dianne noted that these are difficult financial times, and
they may continue for another two or three years. If, however, the college reduces its number of associate
faculty, the college necessarily limits the number of sections the college offers. Once that occurs, it is difficult to
keep the college growing. The
direction from the district is to maintain thoughtful growth and to remain well
positioned to benefit from the good times, when they return. The need for community colleges is proportionate
to the economy. When there is a
downturn in the economy, people look to upgrade their skills and/or
education. The college is trying
to manage enrollment to meet the needs of the students, manage the budget
crisis, and position for the future.
This is a complex issue and a proper balance must be maintained.
A
motion (M/S - VanTassel/Brennan) was made to approve the prioritized list and
hire the five positions and the automatic replacement positions in order to
open discussion on the list. Dianne
stated that there are 26 open positions, which include the growth obligation,
retirements, and resignations.
Five positions met the criteria for automatic fill; either recruitment
efforts failed or a resignation was submitted prior to the completion of two
years. This leaves 21 positions
for ranking, with the possibility of reducing that number by three if the state
waives the obligation factor.
Discussion
ensued on the particular rankings and the recommendations of the DCC:
* The
Communications Studies position is dependent on the allotment of FTE to the
department by the Performance Goals Committee (PGC).
* The PE position is dependent on the possible resignation of a PE
instructor currently on a one-year leave of absence. The college is to be advised by January.
* Due to
concerns regarding the ranking of the ESL-2 position and the Assessment
Coordinator position, several alternatives were presented: 1) assign the Assessment Coordinator to
serve 50% as an ESL instructor, 2)
assign a 50% Assessment Coordinator position, or 3) assign a full-time
Assessment Coordinator position.
Discussion on this item ensued.
Most indicated that a full time Assessment Coordinator was badly needed
and that attaching the position to a particular department was not wise.
The
Senators offered the following observations and recommendations:
* The
second Art position is a replacement for a faculty person scheduled to retire
in 2004.
The
CATA DC explained that the department is short staffed and if the status quo
remains, the department will be left with one relatively new faculty member in
2004. Currently there are three
full-time faculty in the department and 11 FTE.
* The ESL
Department currently has 75 sections; 40 are taught by associate faculty. It will be difficult to ensure standard
outcomes for students moving into Reading, English, etc.
* The
Reference Librarian position is needed because of the permanent reassignment of
a librarian.
* The
Manufacturing position is needed to build the department.
* Distance
Learning (DL) offerings have increased from ten to 53 over the last three
years, and Mina Jahan spoke in support of a distance learning coordinator
position. At this time, the
college has one instructional designer working with faculty on DL offerings.
* It may be appropriate to switch the Political Science position or the
Art position with ESL.
* The
Assessment Coordinator position should be a full time position.
The
above motion to accept the DCC's prioritized list failed, and the following
motion was passed (M/S/P -
Lynne/VanTassel):
"that
the Mission College Academic Senate recommends that the hiring process begin
with the five automatic positions on the prioritized list."
Discussion
continued, and a motion that the Academic Senate reprioritize the list was
withdrawn after Dianne explained that the process over the years has been that
the Senate consider approval of the DCC's recommendation. If there is no approval, there are two
options. One, the DCC and the
Senate meet again to reach consensus, or, if consensus is unattainable, two
recommendations are forwarded to the President - one from the DCC and one from
the MCAS. At this time, only two
DC's remained and after a brief discussion, it was agreed that the Senate will
invite the DC's to attend next week's Senate meeting to discuss and consider
the Senate's recommendations.
The
following motion was passed unanimously (M/S/U - Brennan/Estrada);
"that
the Mission College Academic Senate approve the prioritized list from #1 to
#17, and that the Division Chair Council and the Academic Senate meet again
next Thursday to discuss the remainder of the list, and to send forward the recommendation that the Assessment
Coordinator be a full-time position."
Those
present were advised that the list provided is not for public information and must
remain confidential until finalized.
The
remaining agenda items were postponed to the next Senate meeting.
XI. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
Publications/Minutes
1. The
ACE minutes for the September 19, 2002, and the October 10, 2002, meetings.
2. The November 4, 2002, issue of FA
NEWS from Foothill-DeAnza Faculty
Association.
3. The November 1, 2002, issue of DVC
FORUM from the Diablo Valley College
Faculty Senate.
4. The minutes and agendas for the
October 21st and October 28, 2002, meeting of the Curriculum Review
Committee and the agendas and minutes for the November 4the and November 6,
2002, meetings.
5. The agenda for the October 30,
2002, District Council meeting.
6. The agenda for the November 7,
2002, meeting of the Board of Trustees.
7. The September/October issue of the President's
UPDATE from the state Academic Senate.
8. The agenda for the October 23,
2002, meeting of GAP.
9. The meeting notes for the October
16, 2002, retreat of the Instructional Advisory Team.
10. The minutes for the October 16,
2002, meeting of DBAC.
11. A copy of the 2000/01 IMPAC Annual
Report.
12. A copy of, "A Users' Guide
to Diversity Practices in California Community Colleges from the City College of San Francisco's Promoting
Diversity Practices Project.
Announcements/Conferences
XII. Future Agenda Items
A. Discuss Request for Additional Release
Time for Academic Senate President (Brennan)
XIII. Adjournment
The
meeting was adjourned at 4:05 p.m. (M/S/U - Charland/Estrada).
These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.