Mission
College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Approved
Minutes
Thursday,
October 24, 2002
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:10 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
McAlister (Ext. 5087) Stud.Dev. |
|
X |
|
Charland (Ext. 5046)
Stud. Dev. |
|
X |
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
|
X |
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
|
X |
|
Guich (Ext. 5270) Social Sci. |
|
X |
Oliver (Ext. 5427) AAS |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
X |
|
Patton
(Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Rivas (Ext. 5282) CATA |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5717) AF/CIT |
|
X |
Rosner (Ext. 5317) ESL |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
Other: A.Braun (CRC), |
|
X |
Other: B.Grayson (Staff Dev) |
X |
|
|
S. Hanna (ASB
Rep.) |
|
X |
S. Ghiya (ASB Rep) |
X |
|
|
Division
Chairs |
A |
P |
Division Chairs |
A |
P |
|
Chandler (Social Science) |
|
X |
Dinger (Commercial Services) |
|
X |
|
Chan, R. (Student Services) |
|
X |
Hacker (ESL) |
|
X |
|
Chiang (Math) |
|
X |
McKay (VP of Instruction) |
|
X |
|
Cowels
(AAS) |
|
X |
Messerschmidt (Communctns) |
|
X |
|
Delongchamps (CATA) |
|
X |
Poe (Natural Science) |
|
X |
|
Guests |
A |
P |
Guests |
A |
P |
|
W.S.Chiang, C. Cox, L.Harris |
|
X |
M.Jahan, S.Kinsella, B. Miller, C.Monroe |
|
X
X |
II. Oral Communication from
the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today’s meeting.
III. Approval of Minutes
The
minutes for the October 17, 2002, meeting were accepted and approved as
submitted (M/S/P - VanTassel/Charland).
IV. Joint Meeting w Division
Chair Council to Review Applications for New Faculty
Positions
Jane explained the process developed by the Senate
and the Division Chair Council (DCC) that has been used for the last few years.
It was emphasized that this task is one of the most important responsibilities
of the Senate, and the process is unique to Mission College compared to most
community colleges throughout the state.
The
Academic Senate and the Division Chair Council (DCC) will review the 36
requests submitted. The
appropriate Division Chair will present a supporting argument for each position
in two-minute blocks, and a question and answer period will be held after all
presentations have been made.
After today’s discussion, the Senate representatives and the
Division Chairs will jointly review the list and consider ranking.
Dianne
emphasized that faculty hiring is the most important and serious task
undertaken by faculty because the quality and distribution of faculty most
directly influences the teaching and learning that takes place at Mission
College. She explained that there
are 36 requests: five of them are carried over from last year, and five are
positions in which faculty have retired. Five of the positions are
brand new allocations for this year.
Dianne also explained that of the positions listed below, the five
positions in bold are positions
that will be automatically filled in accordance with past policy and are not to
be included in the ranking. Those
positions have already been approved, and either recruitment efforts failed or,
if the position was filled, the person left before completing two years in the
position.
Dianne
advised that because of the state budget's exigency situation, the state Board
of Governors is considering authorizing a relief of obligation for districts to
hire new faculty. AB 1725 and the growth of the college dictate that
obligation. AB 1725 relates to the
full-time/part -time faculty ratio and the number of new faculty positions is
based on the growth of the college. She explained that if the state grants
relief of the obligation, the college would be able to delay hiring. In that event, it will only affect the
five new positions, which would be reduced by half. If that does not occur, the college will need to hire to the
appropriate level or the district is penalized $55,000 for each position under
goal.
Several
criteria for considering ranking were presented and discussed. It was determined that there were no
requests that were considered "not viable," which was defined as a position
that did not necessarily reflect the direction of the college at this
time. Other criteria to be
considered are: 1) the generation of WSCH, 2) additional costs relative to the
position, 3) the Accreditation Report, 4) the E&FMP, 5) State mandates and/or
regulations, and 6) data from Jim Burrell's report. It was pointed out that even though a position may not
directly generate WSCH, the position may impact the retention of students, thus
affecting WSCH throughout the college.
The
appropriate division chair made a presentation for each request, and the
remaining time was taken up with a question and answer period.
The
positions requested are listed below in alphabetical order. Please note that the five (5) positions
listed in bold are the positions
that have already been allotted, and they will not be included in the ranking.
Art
#1 Health
Occupations #1
Art #2 Health
Occupations #2
Articulation
& Transfer Director Health
Occupations #3
Assessment
Coordinator Health
Occupations #4
Child
Development #1 Health
Occupations #5
Child
Development #2 Health
Occupations #6
CIT Instructional
Tech-1-Tech Center Coordinator
Communication
Studies Instructional
Tech-2-Distance Learning
Counseling
#1-Retention/Lrng Comm Library
Services #1
Counseling
#2-Outreach Library
Services #2
Counseling #3-General Counselor Manufacturing
ESL
#1 Mathematics
#1
ESL
#2 Mathematics
#2
ESL
#3 Music
Fire
Science Physical
Education
Foreign
Language-French Political
Science
Graphic
Arts Reading #1
Graphic
& Multimedia Design Reading
#2
Each
division chair will submit the ranked list, with #1 being the highest priority,
to the Office of Instruction by 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, October 30th.
The Office of Instruction will tally the results, which will be presented at
the Division Chair Council meeting on the following Monday. The DCC will prepare its recommendation,
which will be brought to the Senate at its next meeting on November 7, 2002,
for further discussion, if necessary, and approval.
IV. Adjournment
The
meeting was adjourned at 4:07 p.m. (M/S/U - Sippel/Lynne).
These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.