Mission College Academic Senate
Ext. 5413
Unapproved Minutes
Thursday, May 26, 2005
I. Call to
Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Alex Braun at 2:12 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Braun (Ext. 5355) Pres/Tech |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
X |
|
|
Brichko (Ext. 5222) CATA |
|
X |
McKay
(Ext. 5312) Comm |
X |
|
|
Cogswell (Ext. 5388) AAS |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
|
X |
|
Cox (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Ostrander
(Ext. 5274) Stud Dev. |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X |
Perlas (Ext.
5041) Stud.Dev. |
|
X |
|
Harris (Ext. 5413) AF/Comm |
|
X |
Rath (Ext.
5413) AF/CIT |
|
X |
|
Kashima
(Ext. 5319) ESL |
X |
|
Smebye (Ext. 5305) CommServ |
|
X |
|
Laird (Ext. 5186) SocSci |
|
X |
Szabados (Ext.5289) CATA |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Zeisler (Ext. 5426) Comm |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Guests: W.Negash, H.Robles |
|
X |
II. Approval of the
Minutes
The
minutes for the meeting of May 19, 2005, were accepted and approved as
submitted (M/S/U – Harris/Szabados).
III. Order
of the Agenda
The
Senators agreed to address Item VIII.B immediately following Oral
Communications in order to accommodate Harriett Robles (M/S/U –
Braun/Harris).
IV. Oral Communication from
the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today’s meeting.
As
agreed, the order of the agenda was suspended and moved to Item VIII.B.
VIII. New
Business
B. Consider
Recommendation of DCC re: Additional Instructional Faculty Position
Harriett
Robles, VP of Instruction advised that each college has been asked to hire an
additional instructional faculty member for this fall in order to ensure that
the District meets its Faculty Obligation Number (FON). She stated that the hiring process has
moved through the prioritized list in terms of instructional hires, as approved
jointly by the Division Chair Council and the Academic Senate last
December. Harriett emphasized that
the additional position had to be an instructional position.
Harriett
reported that it was decided that the most efficient way to add an additional
position would be to consider the instructional hires that were underway and
consider the possibility of adding a second hire, assuming the applicant pool
was sufficient enough to yield two candidates. She asked the Division Chairs to consider which departments
would be able to support a second faculty hire, and the following departments
indicated that they could provide load for a second full-time faculty
hire: Biology, Math, Child
Development. Chemistry was another
department put forward, but the department was not certain that it could
support a second position, particularly considering the costs involved in
Chemistry courses. The Division
Chairs were then asked to prioritize the three departments and the
prioritization resulted in the following order:
1) Biology, 2) Math, and 3) Child Development. Harriett asked the Academic Senate to
endorse the recommendation of the Division Chair Council.
Discussion
ensued, and it was stated that this additional position is in addition to the
CIT position, which is currently proceeding through the hiring process. Harriett clarified that if two viable
candidates are not in the pool for Biology, then the Math pool will be
reviewed, and so on, until we find a second faculty position. There was general agreement that the
proposed prioritization was appropriate, and the following motion was passed
unanimously (M/S/U – Cox/Szabados):
“that
the Mission College Academic Senate accept the ranking of Biology, Math, and
Child Development for an additional faculty position.”
The
order of the agenda was resumed.
V. Information
& Announcements
1.
Senator Cogswell, the MCAS representative on the District Council
advised that she will not be able to attend all of the District Council
meetings over the summer. She
recommended that other Senators cover those meetings as important issues will
be addressed over the summer. It
was agreed that this matter will be discussed under committee appointments at
today’s meeting.
2. Senator Zeisler advised that she
has completed a two year term on the Academic Senate as a Communications
representative and she will be replaced by Margaret
Juncker in the Fall.
3. Senator Brichko announced that the
Senators who agreed to serve as Marshals and Readers at Graduation must attend
a rehearsal at the Convention Center at 11:00 a.m. Other faculty are expected to arrive at the Convention Center
by 5:30 p.m.
4. Senator Harris announced that both
she and Senator Rath have completed a two year term on the Mission College
Academic Senate. A call for
candidates and an election will be held in the Fall.
The
members of the Academic Senate expressed their appreciation to Senators Harris,
Rath, and Zeisler for their commitment and participation.
VI. Administrative
Business/Actions/Appointments
A.
Curriculum Committee Report – No
report was presented at today’s meeting.
B. Staff Recognition – No resolutions were presented at today’s meeting.
C. Committee
Appointments
1. Substitute Chair for Accreditation
Steering Committee -
Alex advised that no one had volunteered for this position. During discussion it was determined
that an associate faculty member or a retired faculty member could fill this
position. Senator Liz Harris then
volunteered to serve, and the Senators unanimously approved her appointment
(Zeisler/Cogswell).
2. Information Competency Committee –
The Senators approved the appointment of the following faculty to this
committee (M/S/U – Cox/Cogswell):
Leigh Anne Sippel, Michele Speck, Elaine Wong, and Susan Zeisler.
3. District Council - Since
Senator Cogswell cannot attend the summer meetings of the District Council, the
following Senators agreed to sit in on those meetings as follows and the
Senators approved their appointment (M/S/U – Cogswell/Harris):
Senator Szabados – June 8, 2005
Senator
Brichko - July 6 or July 13, depending on when
the meeting is scheduled.
Senator
Cox – July 27, 2005
Senator
Cogswell – August 10, 2005
Senator
Cox - August 24, 2005.
This
information will be passed on to Rhoda Curry. It was suggested that each substitute update the other
Senators to provide information and to ensure continuity. Alex explained that the District
Council deals with district-wide strategic issues and reviews the Board
agenda. One major issue that will
be discussed this summer is the Kuwait project. Alex reported that the educational institution in Kuwait has
provided the district with $209,000, which will be used for a feasibility
study, to obtain WASC approval, for site visits, and to select a project
coordinator and a third party administrator.
Alex
also advised that he attended a teleconference with Dr. Green at Broward
College in Florida that has several campuses outside of the country. He addressed all of the Senate’s
questions and concerns to Dr. Green, and he responded to most. Alex stated that
Dr. Green was not familiar with Kuwait, and the question regarding the
attendance of women at the school remains to be investigated further. As for hiring faculty, there is an
organization that certifies faculty that teach in institutions outside of the
United States. That organization
will be contacted to determine the process. If the Kuwait project is approved, faculty will be teaching
our curriculum in accordance with our standards and will be represented by ACE.
Discussion
ensued, and Alex advised that if WASC is not satisfied with the
district’s effort, the proposal will not move forward. The issue of
shared governance was raised, and concern was expressed that this proposal is
moving forward without the Senate’s agreement. Alex emphasized that WASC requires the endorsement of the
Academic Senate. If faculty do not
support this project, WASC will not approve the proposal. The Academic Senate retains the power
to veto. Alex was directed to
place this item on the first agenda for the Fall.
D. Oral Reports
- No other reports were presented.
VII. Old
Business
A. Update
on Tenure Credit Issue for Temporary Faculty Hired to Permanent Faculty
Position
Alex
reported that he discussed the Memo of Understanding and the MC Academic
Senate’s motion with Pat Andrews. The Chancellor has agreed to support
the final decision of the Senate and ACE.
Pat’s concerns relate to two points in the Memo of Understanding
and those points were explained to the Senators. The basic concern is whether or not a faculty person could
be denied the additional credit by the tenure review team. Alex asked for direction on how to
proceed.
During
discussion it was clarified that the tenure review teams are formed with the
approval of the VP of Instruction and the Academic Senate President. It was
also explained that a faculty member on a temporary contract receives credit
for that year only if it is followed by a contract year. At the end of the
first year, the tenure review team can recommend to renew, not to renew, or
renew with a recommendation. The tenure review team bases its recommendation on
its evaluation.
Since
granting tenure is a faculty matter, and since the contract allows for
additional review, the consensus of the Senators was to reaffirm the action
taken at last week’s meeting.
Alex was directed to advise Pat Andrews and the Chancellor accordingly.
VIII. New
Business (Continued)
A. Discuss
Concerns Relative to New Faculty Hires Ranking Process
The
Senators were advised that a Crisis Counselor position ranked in last
December’s priority list for faculty hires has been pulled based on
concerns relative to the 50% law.
The Senators were advised that Bob Miller was approached by the VP of
Instruction on this matter and Bob agreed to pull the position for this year
with the understanding that the Counselor position will be given top priority
at next year’s ranking.
Senator Perlas brought this matter to the Academic Senate to consider
the deviation in the process used by the Division Chair Council (DCC) and the
Academic Senate for a number of years.
Discussion
ensued, and concern was expressed relative to the process and the role of the
Academic Senate. The Senate and the DCC spent much time to develop and
prioritize the list of faculty hires, as well as deliberating the CIT
position. The CIT position was
pulled despite the Senate’s request, and placed back on the list after
the Academic Senate took additional action. The question on the Counselor
position issue should have come to the Academic Senate as well as the DCC for
consideration of a resolution to the problem. It is clear that the current process was circumvented and a
promise for top priority was not in keeping with the current process. The Senators directed Alex
to place this issue on the first agenda of the Fall semester to ensure the
matter is addressed prior to ranking the faculty hires for next year.
C. Update Report and
Review of Proposed MC Budget Allocation Model
Worku
Negash presented the Senators with a final draft of the Mission College Budget
Allocation Model (BAM). Worku
explained that a subcommittee of CBAC developed the revised model, which has
been endorsed by CBAC and GAP. The
BAM is only used if and when the college receives new funding from the State or
the college has a carryover. The model is supposed to be reviewed every year,
but since no additional funds have been received over the last few years, the
model has not been revised until now.
Worku
advised the Senate members of the few changes that have been made to the model
since its last endorsement five years ago. Changes of significance include a
change in the amount funded to the College President, inclusion of the
Technology Committee to review technology requests, an additional 12% to
instruction, and under what circumstances this model will be used. It was explained that the
President’s Office received $50,000 under the old model. The new model provides the President
with 10% of the funds received, with a cap of $50,000.
Worku
clarified that this is a college model, and the District has its own Budget
Allocation Model, which is currently under review. A lengthy discussion ensued relative to apportionments as
indicated on a chart in the document.
Based on that discussion, a motion to endorse the Budget Allocation
Model as presented failed.
As discussion continued and additional clarification was made, a motion
to reconsider the main motion passed (M/S/P – Szabados/Dooley).
The
proposed changes to the model were discussed further, and it was emphasized
that this model is only used if additional funds are received from the State or
if there is a carryover of funds in the college. The points of contention dealt
with the percentages allocated to Administration and Student Services. Worku
and several Senators clarified the intent of the allocations further, and
ultimately, the following motion passed (M/S/P – Smebye/Dooley):
“that
the Mission College Academic Senate endorses the College Budget Allocation
Model as presented.”
X. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
Publication/Minutes
1. The
WVMCCD Leadership Institute Funding Proposal dated May 23, 2005,from Albert
Moore and Corri Cooper to the Land Corporation Board of Directors.
2. The agenda for the June 2, 2005,
meeting of the WVMCCD Board of Trustees.
3. The minutes for the May 4, 2005,
meeting of the Accreditation Disjoint Committee.
4. The agenda for the May 25, 2005,
meeting of the District Council.
5. A draft cop of the MC Mid-Term
Accreditation Progress Report to be considered for approval at the May 25,
2005, GAP meeting, and the agenda for the May 25, 2005, meeting.
Announcements/Conferences
1. Mission
College Athletic Booster’s Club is
hosting a Golf Tournament on Friday, September 30, 2005, at the Santa Clara
Municipal Golf Course, 5155 Stars & Stripes Drive in Santa Clara. The tournament will benefit Mission
College athletes. Check-in is at
11:00 a.m. and a barbecue dinner will be held starting at 6:00 p.m. with a no
host bar and dinner at 6:30 p.m. For additional information, please contact
Jeff Nelson, Athletics Director (Ext. 5367).
XI. Future Agenda Items
No new
items were added to today’s agenda.
XII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:10p.m. (M/S/U- Szabados/Harris). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.