Mission College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Unapproved Minutes
Thursday,
March 20, 2003
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:08 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
|
X |
|
Charland (Ext. 5046)
Stud. Dev. |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
X |
|
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X |
Oliver (Ext. 5427) AAS |
X |
|
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Patton
(Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
X |
|
Rivas (Ext. 5282) CATA |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Rosner (Ext. 5317) ESL |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5717) AF/CIT |
|
X |
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
Toppel (Ext. 5089) Stud Dev |
|
X |
|
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Xu
(Ext. 5273) SocSci |
X |
|
|
Guests: Carol
Qazi |
|
|
|
|
|
II. Oral Communication
from the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today's meeting.
III.
New Business
A.
Select
Senators and Division Chairs to District Academic Senate Crisis Subcommittee
President Patton explained that the District Academic
Senate (DAS) passed a motion at Tuesday’s meeting to establish a
Subcommittee of the District Academic Senate to develop guidelines for joint
Division Chair Council/College Academic Senate meetings to consider the
district-wide impact of local college decisions, to establish criteria for the
reductions and changes in faculty, programs, services, and FTE allocations, and
to address the underlying issues which are responsible for the district’s
financial predicament.
It was also agreed that the committee would be comprised
of two Senators from each College Senate, two Division Chairs from each
College, and the VPs of Instruction from each college. In addition, it was agreed that the
selections would be representative of Student Services, Academic
Areas/Transfer. Vocational Education, and Basic Skills. A call for volunteers was issued from
the Senate office and the purpose of today’s meeting is to make those
selections. It is intended that
the committee meet within the week and report back to the District Academic
Senate on April 3, 2003.
The Senators estabished the criteria for their
selections, and it was agreed (M/S/U – Lynne/Mancini) that Division
Chairs Jim DeLongchamp and Steve Dinger would be appointed to the committee as
the DC representatives, filling the Vocational Education and Transfer
positions. These are two people
with broad experience and knowledge of the college and able to represent all
four areas. Carol Toppel and Jane
Patton were appointed to the committee (M/S/P – Brennan/Charland) with
Carol as the representative for Student Services and Basic Skills and Jane
filling as an Academic area position.
There was some discussion regarding a note from ACE
relative to a District advisory committee to consider and give suggestions
regarding the restoration of programs and services. It is their contention that the topics under discussion
raise negotiable issues under the Rodda Act. Jane emphasized that the memo raises some valid points,
except for the point on academic matters, which listed educational objectives
and the determination of curriculum.
Issues of curriculum and educational programs fall under the purview of
the Academic Senate. It is not the
intent of the Senate to charge its subcommittee with “restoration”
of positions, but rather to serve as a research committee and develop
guidelines for joint Division Chair Council/College Academic Senate meetings to
fulfill the tasks mentioned in the motion of the District Academic Senate.
The ultimate goal of the Senate is to retain the 59
targeted positions. During
discussion, it was emphasized that district services needs to make the
appropriate level of cuts. It was
acknowledged that they have made some reductions, but they are not deep enough. The district consists of two colleges
with entities that can interact. We
need to research exactly what tasks central services is responsible for, determine
what the costs are to run central services, research other districts, and
compare. It was also emphasized
that it is imperative that the Board act on the District Academic
Senate’s motion immediately and appoint two members to a joint committee
with faculty selected by the Senates before the next District Academic Senate
meeting on April 3, 2003.
As discussion continued, it was noted that many
faculty were disappointed that the District Academic Senate did not pass a vote
of no confidence in the Chancellor.
There is some concern that such an action will shift the focus from the
current budget crisis and negotiations. As directed by the DAS, the Senate
Presidents will provide the Chancellor with a list of concerns as presented at
the DAS meeting. If there are no apparent changes in style or behavior, there
will be ample time to take such action. It was agreed, the Board needs to be held more
responsible; it has indeed been ineffective for many years. It is the responsibility of the faculty
and the staff to strongly advise the Board as to what is expected of them. There is an urgent need to shift the
paradigm of how the Board operates.
XI. Future
Agenda Items
No new items were introduced at today's meeting.
XII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 3:30 p.m. (M/S/U – Charland/Brennan). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.