Mission College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Unapproved Minutes
Thursday,
March 13. 2003
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Jane Patton at 2:10 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Brennan (Ext. 5313) Comm |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
|
X |
|
Charland (Ext. 5046)
Stud. Dev. |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X |
Oliver (Ext. 5427) AAS |
|
X |
|
Estrada (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Patton (Ext. 5296) Comm Stud |
|
X |
|
Johnson (Ext.5277) CATA |
|
X |
Rivas (Ext. 5282) CATA |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Rosner (Ext. 5317) ESL |
|
X |
|
Light (Ext. 5717) AF/CIT |
|
X |
Sippel (Ext. 5118) Comm |
|
X |
|
Lynne (Ext. 5248) CommSvc |
|
X |
Toppel (Ext. 5089) Stud Dev |
X |
|
|
Mancini (Ext. 5855) AF/HM |
|
X |
VanTassel (Ext. 5334) Tech |
|
X |
|
|
|
|
Xu
(Ext. 5273) SocSci |
|
X |
|
Other: A.Braun (CRC), |
|
X |
Other: B.Grayson (Staff Dev) |
|
X |
|
ASB Rep. J.Weston Guests.
A.Chandler, R.Dewis, |
|
X X |
Guests: S.Dinger, J. Halasa, L.Harris, R.Smybe |
|
X X |
II. Approval of the Minutes
The
minutes for the meeting of February 27, 2003, were accepted and approved with
the following corrections (M/S/U – Charland/Mancini):
Page
5, Item C (Discuss Status of Information Competency as a Graduation
Requirement)- Third sentence is corrected as follows: “The requirement can be implemented in several ways: 1) proficiency exam, 2) infused into
classes (i.e. English 1A and/or Oral Communication classes), or 3)
Library 10 course.
Page
3, Item C.b) (Reduction in Administrative Staff) - Regarding the second
sentence: “He (Dr. Samuels)
is forming a committee of three administrators, one faculty member, and one
from classified staff.” Dr.
Samuels requested that Jane clarify the information, stating that he is not
forming a committee, but rather is just having a conversation about reductions
in administrative staff. He
invited Jane, Carol Toppel, Matthew Grayson, Luyang Jiang, Dianne McKay, and Dan
Matarangas to join him in a one-meeting conversation. (M/S/U –
Sippel/Charland).
This
clarification prompted a discussion where several Senators and guests indicated
their concerns relative to the status of shared governance at the college.
The
minutes for the meeting of March 6, 2003, were accepted and approved with the
following correction (M/S/U – Charland/Estrada):
Page
3, Item II (Joint Meeting of the DCC and the MCAS) – The first,
“Therefore” statement in the resolution is corrected as follows:
“Therefore,
Let it Be Resolved, That the Board reaffirm to all administrators that the
absolute necessity of consultation, partnership, and shared responsibility in
the development and . . .”
III.
Order of the
Agenda
There
were no changes to the order of the agenda.
IV. Oral
Communication from the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today's meeting.
V. Information
& Announcements
1.
Senator Van Tassel
showed videotapes of the TV broadcasts from the Thursday and Saturday Board of
Trustees meetings.
2.
On Friday, Jane will be
on site visits for the two final candidates for President.
3.
The District Academic
Senate meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, March 18, 2003, at 2:00 p.m. in the
Small Business Development Center, 84 West Santa Clara Street, Suite 100,
Training Room.
VI. Administrative
Business/Actions/Appointments
A. Curriculum
Committee - Alex reported
that the committee will be meeting this Monday and next to deal with a large
volume of new course proposals, administrative changes, etc.
B. Staff
Recognition - No resolution was presented.
C. Committee
Appointments - None
D. Oral Reports
1.
Staff
Development - No report
2.
District
Information Technology Steering Committee – * Senator Light
reported that the committee met last Friday and discussed a major issue
regarding Datatel. A development
server purchased for Datatel was discussed; and a major issue concerns Release
17. This is similar to a service pack that meets mandated reporting for
Financial Aid. It is absolutely
necessary for the next school year.
Last month everything was fine.
This month it was mentioned that Datatel will not be on the Release 17
until September 1. It is critical
that this be ready by July 1, and IS may call in consultants to assist. * The $1 million plus in uncollected student
receivables was also discussed. If
collected, additional funds will be provided for the district.
3. Instructional Technology Committee - No
report
4. Subcommittee on Graduation Requirements
– No report
5. Report from D. Cordero on IMPAC – Don Cordero was unable to attend
today’s meeting due to a conflict in schedule.
6. Other:
VII.
Old Business
A.
Continue
Discussion of Budget Crisis, Including:
1)
Identify
Criteria for Prioritization of Academic Support Services
2)
Discuss and
Clarify Understanding of FON Waiver
3)
Other
President Patton opened the floor to general discussion before addressing the individual items listed above. Senator Sippel voiced her concerns and disappointment regarding the amount and the nature of communications on campus. She noted that most of the communications are conducted via e-mail. It is her view that much of the information requires a group process for full interpretation and understanding. She noted that the forums for the presidential candidates were poorly attended and that people are relying on the information in e-mail communications. She presented the following motion for the Senate’s consideration (M/S – Sippel/Charland):
“Whereas, The current state of the budget requires that accurate and recent
information pertaining to college decisions be communicated in a consistent
manner; and
Whereas,
The college attempts to facilitate communication through committees made up of
representatives of the campus constituency; and
Whereas,
Two-way dialog is a manner of communication far preferable to that of email or
memos; and
Whereas,
Lack of communication can result in rumors and misinformation at best, and
anger and irresponsible decisions at worst;
Be It Therefore Resolved, That the Mission College Academic Senate demand that
all divisions hold meetings with their members at a rate of once per month at
the minimum, and that all faculty recognize their obligation to attend these
meetings; and
Be It Further Resolved, That the Mission College Academic Senate demand that
members of all college committees take their charges with utmost seriousness
and deliver full, qualitative reports on the actions and information gathered
from all campus committee meetings, and that representatives regularly poll
their constituency to gather consensus on pending issues; and
Be It Finally Resolved, That all Mission College employees endeavor to share
information via interactive groups rather than individual delivery of hearsay,
and that the means of delivering information via email not be taken as the
qualitative equivalent of two-way interaction.”
Discussion ensued and many agreed that it is
imperative that information be shared appropriately and that it is the
responsibility of the Department Chairs and/or the Division Chairs to hold
regular meetings. Division Chair
(DC) Steve Dinger noted that DC’s are attending critical meetings every week
and there are not enough forums for people to get together for monthly
meetings. Senators Light and
Mancini reported that they have established a Yahoo group to provide
information for Associate Faculty and that it has proven to be very successful. A similar web site may prove to be
useful for full-time faculty as well.
Another suggestion is to block out time within the departments
specifically to hold meetings.
It
was stated that although department and division meetings will assist in
communications, there is a bigger problem in that the President needs to keep
the entire college community informed on a daily basis of events as they occur.
It is critical that the college community be pulled together by its
leadership. Part of good
leadership is transparency, a process, and communication. Without it, a vacuum is created that is
being filled by rumor, innuendo, anxiety, and stress. The community needs to receive more administrative
information in open forum. Then
the appropriate questions can be asked.
The above motion was passed and discussion moved on to item #1 (Identify
Criteria for Prioritization of Academic Support Services).
The
Senators reviewed a list of grouped support services prepared by GAP. It is Jane’s contention that
several of the services listed are academic support services and fall under the
purview of the Academic Senate.
Several subcommittees of GAP members were formed to consider the dollar
amount required for the services and GAP members will hold qualitative
discussions and review the list once again. Jane feels strongly that the Academic Senate should rank
those services that are academic in nature, and asked that a Senate
subcommittee be formed to consider those services and rank the list
accordingly. Senators Charland, Estrada,
Lynne, Rosner and Sippel volunteered to meet with President Patton to take on
that charge.
At
this time, it was agreed, by consensus, to suspend the order of the agenda and
move to Item VII.B (Vote on Information Competency as Graduation Requirement)
and return to Item VII.A upon completion of B.
B.
Vote on
Information Competency as Graduation Requirement
Senator Estrada presented the following motion for the Senate’s consideration (M/S – Estrada/Mancini):
“that the Mission College Academic Senate
recommend that Information Competency be included as a proficiency requirement
for graduation. Students would be
able to demonstrate information competency skills in one of the following
ways: 1) by the successful completion of the course Library 10,
Information Competency; or 2) by successful completion of selected courses (to
be determined) that infuse elements of information competency, possibly
supplemented by library information competency workshops; or 3) by passing a
standardized information competency exam, and that the Academic Senate form a
subcommittee to consider the most appropriate way to implement the
requirement.”
During discussion, the ASB representative asked if
this change will effect students already enrolled, and it was stated that the
requirement would not start until listed in the catalog. The above motion passed and it
was agreed that this item will be placed on a future agenda in order to appoint
a subcommittee to work on the implementation of the requirement.
The
order of the agenda was resumed and discussion returned to Item VII.A. Item #2
(Discuss and Clarify Understanding of FON Waiver).
President Patton reminded the Senators that both
Academic Senates agreed to request a waiver of the Faculty Obligation Number
(FON) from the State Chancellor’s Office due to the current budget
situation. She reported that the
State Academic Senate actively opposes any waivers to the FON. That number is the minimum number of
faculty required to run a college.
This week, the Board of Governors met in Sacramento and the FON was
discussed. Both Dr. Arterberry and
Dr. Fox were present. It has been
reported back that the BOG did not take any action on this issue and referred
the matter to consultation. This means that the question regarding the waiver
of the FON will be studied and not determined until May. There is some concern that a
misunderstanding of our Academic Senates’ intent to request the waiver
has been reported. It must be
clearly stated that we (the Academic Senates) only agreed to a one-year waiver
for next year’s faculty hires, with the intent to revert to the original
number the next year. It was not
intended to be a request for a permanent waiver of the FON. This matter will be discussed further
at the District Academic Senate meeting on Tuesday to ensure that the
Senate’s position is clear.
There was a brief discussion on the effect the waiver will have on the
full-time/part-time ratio and the number of FTES. It was agreed that the facts should be clarified before
Tuesday’s meeting and Jane will investigate the matter further.
3) Other: It was
noted that in 1997 a similar leadership crisis arose in this district that
resulted in a Vote of No Confidence in the Chancellor. The Mission College Academic Senate
minutes from that time were read and the similarities were disconcerting. The combined lack of leadership from
the President and the Chancellor must be pointed out to the Board. The President should act as a beacon,
taking a visible role as an advocate of Mission College by communicating
weekly, if not daily, and providing good information.
Discussion
veered to the actions taken by the Board outside of shared governance, i.e. the
appointment of the Interim Vice Chancellor. In addition it appears that the resolutions prepared by the
Board were not made thoughtfully with regard to the impact layoffs will have on
the colleges and the services they provide. President Patton cautioned that the Senators must use all
their critical thinking skills and be wary of rumors and gossip. As Senate leaders, they can help their
colleagues by exercising restraint and ascertaining the facts. There are so many unknowns; so much
depends on state funding and negotiations.
Jane
was directed to send the motion presented by Senator Sippel to all
faculty.
The
remaining business items were postponed to a future meeting.
X. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
1.
A copy of a letter
dated March 20, 2003, from Dr. Arterberry to the State Chancellor regarding the
Equity and Diversity Task Force Report.
2.
A copy of the most
current VN and PT degree program documents for review at the Curriculum Review
Committee.
3.
An e-mail memo
regarding items to be reviewed at the District Council meeting of March 12,
2003, regarding Student Accounts Receivable Collection Plan.
4.
An e-mail dated March
13, 2003, from the Community College League of California with an update on
legislative actions relative to budget.
5.
An e-mail dated March
4, 2003, from Chancellor Nussbaum with a budget update.
6.
Letter dated March 4,
2003, f4rom the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges with a
report on the January 8-10, 2003, Commission meeting.
Publication/Minutes
1.
The notice of the
Adjourned Board Meeting and the Special Meeting of March 8, 2003, to March 13,
2003.
2.
The Summary Notes for
the February 28, 2003, meeting of GAP and a revised list of prioritized groups.
3.
The March 12, 2003,
agenda for DBAC and minutes for the March 5, 2003, meeting.
4.
The agenda for the
March 10, 2003, meeting of the Curriculum Review Committee and the summary for
the February 24, 2003, meeting.
5.
A copy of the Senate
Budget and Fiscal Review Subcommittee No. 1 dated March 3, 2003, with the
written testimony of Chancellor Nussbaum.
6.
A copy of HR Board
Items that will appear on the March 20th Board Agenda and to be
reviewed at the March 12, 2003, District Council meeting.
Announcements/Conferences
1. Two
additional DBAC meetings will be held:
March 26th (3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.) and April 9th (3:30 p.m. to
5:00 p.m.). Both meetings will be
held at Mission College in Campus Center Room 219/220.
XI. Future
Agenda Items
No new items were introduced at today's meeting.
XII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:10 p.m. (M/S/U – Mancini/Brennan). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.