Mission College Academic Senate
Ext. 2783
Unapproved Minutes
Thursday, February 25, 1999
I. Call to Order/Roll Call
The meeting was called to order by President Dianne McKay at 2:08 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Chiang (Ext. 3424) Math |
|
X |
Hill (Ext. 3366) CATA |
|
X |
|
Collins (Ext.2708) StudDev |
|
X |
Hudak (Ext.3419) ESL |
X |
|
|
Cordero(Ext. 3142) Stud Dev |
|
X |
McKay (Ext. 3418) Pres |
|
X |
|
Cowels (Ext.3301) AAS |
|
X |
Monroe (Ext. 3349) Tech |
X |
|
|
DelFrate (Ext. 3339)CommSv |
|
X |
Moyers (Ext. 3404) Soc Sci |
X |
|
|
Ensminger (Ext. 3142)Comm |
X |
Patton (Ext. 3402) Comm |
|
X |
|
|
Flolo (Ext.3309) AAS |
X |
|
Smith (Ext.3223) CommServ |
X |
|
|
Other: |
Guests: D. Lamkin, D.Matarangas, J.Replicon |
X X |
II. Approval of the Minutes
The minutes for the February 11, 1999, meeting were accepted and approved as submitted (M/S/U - Cordero/Patton).
III. Order of the Agenda
The Senators agreed (M/S/U - Patton/Collins) to move Item XI.D (Discuss Concerns re: Bookstore) for discussion at today's meeting as an emergency item; Dianne explained that the Board agenda for March 4th lists an item to consider a new bookstore contract. She has invited Dan Matarangas to discuss this item with the Senate. It was also agreed, by consensus, that the order of agenda would be changed to accommodate guests.
IV. Oral Communication from the Public
Cliff Monroe distributed copies of a book, celebrating Intel's 30th anniversary, One Digital Day - How the Microchip is Changing our World. One copy will be available for loan from the Senate office.
V. Information & Announcements
1. Brochures advertising the Mission College President's position and the Chancellor's position for the District were distributed to each Senator. Dianne reported that the ads have been out for approximately one week, and the committee will start reviewing applications by March 15th.
2. Betty Ensminger has been selected by the Communications Division as Carol Wilson's replace- ment on the Senate.
VI. Administrative Business/Actions/Appointments
A. Curriculum Committee - No report was made at today's meeting.
B. Staff Recognition - No nominations were presented at today's meeting.
C. Committee Appointments
1. Appoint Senator to CGAC - There is a vacant seat on this committee for a Senator. Dianne asked the Senate members present to consider serving on the committee.
2. Appoint Joseph Ordaz to Flex Committee - The Senators approved the appointment of Joseph Ordaz to the Flex Committee (M/S/U - Ensminger/Cordero).
3. Appoint Marsha Chan to Technology Committee - The Senators approved the appointment of Marsha Chan to replace Pat Hudak on this committee (M/S/U - Ensminger/Cordero).
D. Oral Reports
1. Workforce Development Committee - No report was made at today's meeting.
2. Technology Committee Report - * Pat Hudak reported that Bruce has asked the members of the committee to consult with their department and divisions in order to better determine lab needs for the future. * The WVC Technology Advisory Committee reviews all
academic computer purchases. Bruce would like the Senate to consider a similar charge for the
MC Technology Committee. The intent is to facilitate recommendations and ensure network compatibility. This would allow one group to collect all pertinent information regarding technology and coordinate efforts. * Dianne noted that the Senate's Distance Learning Subcommittee will meet next week.
3. PFE Steering Committee - Judie Smith reported that 51 applications for PFE projects have been received and will be ranked by the committee next week. Approximately $550,000 has been allotted for PFE projects, and the applications exceed that amount.
4. Others:
a) Budget Allocation Committee - Don reported that the committee is reviewing other budget allocation models and moving ahead aggressively. It is unlikely, however, that the model will be affected this year. A report will be submitted to Les White and to DBAC.
As agreed, the order of agenda was suspended and moved to Item VII.D to accommodate Dan Matarangas.
VII. Old Business
D. Discuss Concerns re: Bookstore
Dianne explained that this discussion is prompted by the many complaints received about the bookstore this semester and an item on the next Board agenda to approve a new contract for the bookstore. Dan explained that the Chancellor's Committee decided to request bid proposals for both college bookstores, noting that a dual contract is more lucrative for the colleges. Two bids have been received (Follett and Barnes & Noble), and, because the contract will be for the two colleges, the contract is a better deal for the colleges. He noted that the bookstore's gross income is shared with the college and applied toward the maintenance and function of the Student Center. Dan explained further that all materials, i.e. shelving, inside the bookstore belong to the vendor, unlike the cafeteria; the equipment inside the cafeteria belongs to the college. Hence the urgency to select the bookstore vendor, since the vendor must invest a significant amount of money, approximately $150,000, to furnish the new bookstore in the Student Center. The intent is to have the bookstore and front lobby of the Student Center open by the end of April.
Questions were asked that pertained to particulars of the contract such as exclusive rights, on-line purchases, and the assistant manager's current role and function. Several Senators stated their concerns relative to the difficulties experienced this semester , and Dan advised that he has reported the problems to management and he has been advised that they will be resolved. Even though the Auxiliary Services Committee seems to be defunct, Carolyn Kuri continues to serve as a liaison between vendors and college personnel. Dan agreed to keep the Senate updated.
As agreed, the order of agenda was suspended and moved to Item VIII.A to accommodate Jean Replicon.
VIII. New Business
A. Discuss Global Ed Grant's Project re: Exchange w Student in Honduras
Jean Replicon presented a project proposal from Global Education to establish a partnership with a four year college and research institution in Honduras known as Zamorano. This private institution offers Baccalaureate and Masters degrees, and has established partnerships with the University of Illinois, Radcliffe, Purdue, Cornell, and Iowa State. Currently, a number of Mission College students have established "key pals" and the project would foster and expand the program. She noted that the students at Zamorano are required to attain a 500 TOEFL as a graduation requirement.
Mission College students and faculty would benefit from the program, expanding global awareness through communication and exchange. Zamorano would benefit through our distance learning and ESL courses. The students at Zamorano are from all over Central and South America. Rita has sent a formal letter of interest to the general director of the institution, and received a positive response. An exploratory team will be sent to Honduras on March 25. The team consists of Lee Callaway, Bruce Judd, Jean Replicon, Joni Thissen, and Royal Watts. She asked the Senators for their views and concerns, if any, on this proposal.
Senator Patton, in referring to the Thailand experience, urged that the partnership avoid offering Mission College courses for Mission College credit. If that is to occur, then there needs to be further discussion. Another concern expressed is that Mission College provides an equal opportunity to all and Mission College's student population would necessarily differ from the student population at a private school in a poor country. Others noted that such an experience can alter and enrich one's life beyond words. Jean will keep the Senate posted on the progress of this proposal.
A. Report from Senate Subcommittee on Creating & Eliminating Depts.
A draft proposal for a policy and procedures for the creation of new departments was reviewed, amended, and is attached to these minutes (See Appendix A) for review by faculty. Any comments, recommendations, or concerns should be forwarded to your Senator or the Senate President, Dianne McKay.
The Senators also received copies of a draft proposal for a policy and procedures for the discontinuation of a department. They were asked to review this document with their constituents and be prepared to discuss this proposal at a future Senate meeting. It was also suggested that the draft be presented to ACE for comment as well.
B. Consider Adoption of Policy to Allow A Baccalaureate Degree to Substitute for GE Requirements for a Associate Degree
The following draft was presented to the Senate for consideration by Senator Cordero and the Senators accepted the draft as a first reading (M/S/U - Patton/Collins):
Academic Policy
Mission College Academic Senate
"Background: Many persons returning to Community College for specific job preparation or job advancement already possessing a baccalaureate degree. Almost without exception they have completed somewhere between 30 to 60 units of general education. Because the university has granted the degree, the Mission College academic community wishes to acknowledge the accomplishment of the degree holder by honoring the completion of the various general education patterns that students will have completed.
To that end the Mission College Academic Senate has adopted the following educational policy:
If a person has completed all of the requirements for a baccalaureate degree from a regionally accredited university in the United States and presents official transcripts that verify completion, Mission College will accept, "as completed" the required units and proficiencies of General Education needed for an Associate in Arts or Associate in Science degree. Courses in respective majors must be completed and the overall grade point average of the university work and the work at Mission College must be a 2.00 level or better. Also, the student must earn a minimum grade point average of 2.00 in the work completed only at Mission College."
Don noted that this policy, if approved, will appear in the catalog as an academic policy. This matter will be brought back to the Senate next week for a second reading and approval. It was suggested that the Dean of Instruction be advised of this proposal.
C. Discuss Reorganization of Staff Development
This item was postponed to the next Senate meeting.
IX. President's Reports
1. Board Meeting (February 18) - The board meeting was a strategic conversation on Shared Governance. David Viar of CCLC and Bill Scroggins of the State Academic Senate presented background and information on shared governance and then took questions from the audience.
2. District Council (February 24)- Reviewed the Pre-Board Agenda for March 4, 1999. The proposal for support for Classified Senate participation in shared governance was reviewed. Updates were given on the Presidential and Chancellor Search Processes, and on the PFE District Steering Committee.
Extraordinary District Council Meeting (February 24) - An extraordinary meeting of the District Council was held following the regular meeting to review and discuss the function of District Council, the representative role of the District Council Members and the process by which it works, and facilitates itself. This review was requested as a function of readying the council for a new chancellor. Roles and functions were clarified reflecting the growth that has occurred in this group over the past year.
3. College Budget Advisory Committee (February 24) - Reports were heard from the PFE Committee on their budget allocation process. For this one-time run, the PFE committee will allocate the monies and CBAC will be informed of the allocations. In future allocations, it is recommended that PFE become the "fourth box" in the CBAC allocation model. Discussion needs to occur on this, however. The District Budget Process Review process was reported. This group is making slow progress. There was question on whether they will be able to complete their charge in the time remaining. In addition, FY99 budget and FY00 budget processes, activities and problems were discussed.
4. College Governance Advisory Council (February 23) - College Governance discussed a recommendation from Lee Callaway for an Accreditation Standing Committee. This will be agendized for discussion and action at the next Senate meeting. The issue of future Testing Center services was discussed and will be discussed further. The issue of space allocation was discussed and an additional space/facilities meeting is scheduled for Wed. March 17.
5. Division Chair Council
(February 22) - Information was disseminated on issues like the Summer/Fall Class Schedules, the need for CRC representatives from Social Sciences, and New Faculty Hire packets being due by February 26. Discussion was held on the future of the Testing Center, the Student Services Infill Plan for the area vacated by the Bookstore and Cafeteria, and Accounting Computer Lab Usage.6. Others:
a) Staff Development Steering Committee (February 19) - A three hour retreat was held to review and make recommendations on the future structure of Staff Development. After much discussion, one functional model and one staffing model for staff development were proposed. The meeting ended there and an additional meeting was scheduled for Friday, February 26, to continue discussion.
X. Correspondence, Publications, & Announcements
Correspondence
1. Letter dated February 10, 1999, from the state Chancellor's Office re: Unused Funds/Reallocated Funds Reporting Process.
2. Copy of letter dated November 30, 1998 from the state Chancellor's Office to Bill Scroggins
re: Part-Time Faculty and the 60% law.
Publications/Minutes
1. The minutes for the January 27, 1999, meeting of the District Council and the agenda for
February 24, 1999.
2. The February 19,1999, issue of DVC FORUM from the Diablo Valley College Senate.
3. The minutes for the January 21, 1999, meeting of the M-WV Land Corporation and the agenda
for February 18, 1999.
4. A Working Paper from the state Chancellor re: Important Historical Data, Trends, and Analysis
Relevant to Full-Time/Part-Time Issues.
5. The Fall 1998, Academic Senate JOURNAL from Napa Valley College.
Announcements/Conferences
1. The Academic Senate for CCC's is sponsoring the "Technology for Teaching" conference in Monterey, June 13- 18, 1999. Additional information and registration will be made available
at www.academicsenate.cc.ca.us.
2. The Mission College Library and IMC have extended hours as follows:
Monday - Thursday 9:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m.
Friday 9:00 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
Saturday 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m.
3. Mission College has been invited to participate in the Milpitas High School Community College and Trades Day to be held at Milpitas High School on March 19, 1999, from 10:14 a.m. to 12:53 p.m. Target student population is High School seniors who do not have definite career
and college plans. Faculty and Staff interested in participating should contact Regina's office
for an information packet. RSVP deadline is March 1, 1999.
4. The 21st Annual Great Teachers Seminar will be held in Santa Barbara, August 1-6, 1999.
5. The 4th Annual California State University Conference on the Retention of Latino Students in
Higher Education, "Chicanos/Latinos in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities for
Student Success" will be held at CSU, Dominguez Hills in Carson, Friday, April 16, 1999.
6. The 1999 Community College Counselor Institute, "Ensuring Transfer Success," will be held in Sacramento, April 12-13, 1999.
7. The Accrediting Commission for Community & Junior Colleges is soliciting individuals who wish to be considered for membership on the commission. Application deadline is April 15, 1999. Additional information and the application form is available from the Senate Office.
XI. Future Agenda Items
1. Update Status on Concerns re: Testing Center (Senate) GRA EVERY WEEK
2. Discuss Concerns re: Interdisciplinary & Overlapping Courses (McKay)
3. Consider Proposal to Establish Standing Accreditation Committee (McKay)
4. Consider Approval to Change Structure of Technology Committee (Hudak)
(March 11)
5. Discuss Office Space Allocation Proposal (Chiang) (March 11)
The meeting was adjourned at 4:05 p.m. (M/S/U - Chiang/Cordero). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.
Appendix A
DRAFT- Senate Subcommittee on New Departments - DRAFT
Recommendations
Draft 7 - 02/25/99
Academic Policy and Procedures for Establishing New Programs, and Departments
Definitions:
Discipline: A focused area of study or branch of learning (e.g., History, English, Word Processing, Physics, Nutrition, Graphic Design). Each discipline consists of all the courses in the Master Course File that make up the field of study. This is the baseline level of instruction and is often linked to the Taxonomy of Programs (TOP code) government list.
Program: An organized sequence of courses leading to a defined objective, a degree, a certificate, a diploma, a license, or transfer to another institution of higher education. (CCR T.5 55000) This definition comes from the Curriculum Standards Handbook.
Department: An organizational entity comprised of disciplines and programs with at least one or projected full time faculty member.
Creating a Discipline or Program at Mission College:
1. The new discipline/program must satisfy an objectively proven need. The need must be documented. The following list cover s most of the major areas.
an advisory committee recommendation;
employment and job market analysis;
industry demand and support;
transfer major to a university;
emerging or new university program;
community need or other objective indicator;
improvement of student access to educational opportunity;
support for the strategic direction of the college;
2. The new discipline/program must support the college's stated goals and strategic plan.
3. Disciplines/Programs will begin as temporary (after experimental courses are proven) for a period of up to 4 semesters. Upon review they must show a positive impact in areas such as WSCH generation and other outcome measures in order to attain continuing status. Departments can be formed after the viability of the disciplines and related academic programs are verified.
4. FTEf for creating a discipline/program will come from a floating pool of FTEf determined by the Performance Goals Committee. It is recommended in allocating FTEf that, when possible, the Performance Goals Committee gives careful consideration to new disciplines/programs over additional sections of existing courses.
To create a discipline/program a faculty member presents a proposal that addresses all pertinent issues and then presents the proposal for support to the following groups:
I. A Faculty member or group brings the proposal addressing objectively documented need to the current department (if applicable) and Division for first review and written comments;
II. Approval of current department (if applicable);
III. Approval of Division
IV. Division Chair takes the proposal to the Division Chair Council and Executive Administrative Council for review;
V. The Proposer makes sure that curriculum is in the correct format and presented to Curriculum Committee for first reading. (This step can be done anywhere in the process prior to probationary approval);
VI. Approval of curriculum by Curriculum Review Committee;
VII. Periodic review by Performance Goals during the four semester probation period to determine viability of the discipline or program;
It is assumed that in each step, there is the possibility that the discipline or program will not be approved and discontinued before the probationary period expires.
Creating a Department at Mission College
1. The new department must satisfy an objectively proven need. The need must be documented with data as well as any qualitative narrative supplied by the petitioner(s). The following are examples. Other determinants may apply.
an advisory committee recommendation;
employment and job market analysis;
industry demand and support;
transfer major to a university;
emerging or new university department;
community need or other objective indicator;
improvement of student access to educational opportunity;
support for the strategic direction of the college;
2. The new department must support the college's stated goals and strategic plan.
3. (NOTE: Disciplines/Programs begin as temporary for a period of up to 4 semesters and, upon review, demonstrate that a positive impact in areas such as WSCH generation and other outcome measures are verified.) Departments will be formed after the quantitative and qualitative measure of the disciplines and related academic programs are demonstrated and will not be temporary, except as noted in the section, Program Maintenance, below.
To create a department a faculty member presents a proposal that addresses all pertinent issues and present s the proposal for support to the following groups:
I. A Faculty member or group brings the proposal addressing objectively documented need to the current Division for first review;
II. Division Chair takes the proposal to the Division Chair Council and Executive Administrative Council for review;
III. Faculty member or group brings the proposal addressing objectively documented need to Academic Senate for first reading; data must be provided. The Senate will distribute the proposal via minutes to all faculty.
IV. The proposer(s) take the proposal to the Senate and request second reading and approval;
V. Final Approval by Academic Senate upon receiving verification from the Division Chair Council and Executive Administrative Council that the proposed department can meet the needs and is fits the strategic direction of the college.
VI. The Division Chair(s) and faculty member(s) who seek to house the newly approved department make a presentation to the Academic Senate with the rationale for adding the new department. The Senate approves or modifies the request.
Maintaining a Department/Program:
1. All existing departments will review themselves in their periodic Program Review cycle and more often if necessary.
2. Within the Program Review, the department would review their component disciplines and programs for health and vigor based on criteria set by their department and college goals and strategic plans.
3. Based on the review of the department, recommendations by department faculty, the Division Chair Council and Executive Administrative Council can be made to the Academic Senate for alterations, additions or elimination of the discipline, program or department.
Procedures for the elimination of disciplines, programs or departments is in a separate document
dc:mac/:academic senate 98-99/depts approval 02/25/99