Mission College Academic Senate
Ext.
5413
Approved Minutes
Thursday,
February 17, 2005
I. Call
to Order/Roll Call
The
meeting was called to order by President Alex Braun at 2:10 p.m.
|
Senators |
A |
P |
Senators |
A |
P |
|
Braun (Ext. 5355) Pres/Tech |
|
X |
Martin (Ext. 5356) Tech. |
X |
|
|
Brichko (Ext. 5222) CATA |
X |
|
McKay (Ext. 5312) Comm |
|
X |
|
Cogswell (Ext. 5388) AAS |
|
X |
Musat (Ext. 5331) Math |
|
X |
|
Cox (Ext.5164) CommSvc |
|
X |
Ostrander (Ext. 5274) Stud Dev. |
|
X |
|
Dooley (Ext. 5379) AAS |
|
X |
Perlas (Ext. 5041) Stud.Dev. |
X |
|
|
Harris (Ext. 5413) AF/Comm |
|
X |
Rath (Ext. 5413) AF/CIT |
X |
|
|
Kashima (Ext. 5319)
ESL |
|
X |
Smebye
(Ext. 5305) CommServ |
|
X |
|
Laird (Ext. 5186) SocSci |
|
X |
Szabados
(Ext.5289) CATA |
|
X |
|
Lavallo (Ext. 5399) Math |
|
X |
Zeisler (Ext. 5426) Comm |
|
X |
|
Other: T.McCracken (ASB Rep) |
|
X |
Other: K.Raczkowski (ASB Rep) |
|
X |
|
Guests: R.Charland, M.Myint, |
|
X |
Guests: J.VanTassel |
|
X |
II. Approval
of the Minutes
The
minutes for the February 10, 2005, meeting were accepted and approved with the
following corrections (M/S/U – Harris/Raczkowski):
Page
2, Item VI.A – Starting with the second sentence, all dates are changed
from 2006 to 2005.
Page
2, Item VI.C.2 – The date is changed from March 3, 2006 to March 3, 2005.
III. Order of the Agenda
The
Senators agreed to postpone Item VIII.A at the request of Senator Kashima
(M/S/U).
IV. Oral Communication from
the Public
There
was no oral communication from the public at today's meeting.
V. Information
& Announcements
1. Senator
Szabados announced that there will be a free virtual reality workshop on
Friday, February 25, 2005, in the Telecommunications Building from 9:30 a.m. to
Noon. New technology will be
introduced.
2. Senator Szabados announced that
there will be a free Digital Photography Workshop on Friday, March 4, 2005, in
the Technology Building from 1:00 p.m. until 5:00 p.m.
3.
On March 18, 2005, from 10:00 a.m.
to 4:00 p.m., Dr. Peter Olson from New York will be the keynote speaker on
“How to Create Successful Online Course Work.” The event includes free lunch and will
be held in the Telecommunications Building.
4. The ASB is hosting a Black History
Month event on Monday, February 28, 2005, from 7:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at
Hospitality Management.
5. On March 11, 2005, there will be a
second Learning Community Workshop in Hospitality Management from 8:30 a.m. to
3:00 p.m. The fee of $25.00
includes breakfast and lunch. The
keynote speaker is Dr. Vincent Tinto from Syracuse University.
6. A workshop on Student Learning
Outcomes will be held April 7th and 8th in the College of
San Mateo.
7. The Accreditation
Commission’s annual report has been received, indicating that the Mission
College mid-term report has been accepted.
VI. Administrative
Business/Actions/Appointments
A. Curriculum
Committee - No report
was presented at today’s meeting.
B. Committee
Appointments
1. MC Academic Senate Rep. to GAP – The Senators selected Pat Hudak by written
ballot to serve as the Senate’s representative to GAP.
2. MC Academic Senate Rep. to District
Council – The Senators selected Betti
Cogswell to serve as the Senate’s representative to the District Council
(M/S/U – Cox/Harris).
C. Oral Reports
1. Staff Development - No
report was presented at today’s meeting.
2. Update Report from MCAS Subcommittees on
MCAS Goals & Objectives –
a) Student Equity Plan – The plan was approved at last week’s
meeting.
b) Student Learning Outcomes Committee – The committee’s work is progressing.
c) Academic Directions Committee – This committee’s work involves the
Balance of
Curriculum, which the full Senate will handle. Alex advised that he is meeting with
the VP
Of Instruction
next week to discuss ideas on how to manage the college’s academic
Direction,
particularly as it relates to faculty, how to deal with program review and
accreditation
issues as well.
3. Other – A concern was raised relative to the Senate’s
role in instructional planning and
procedures.
Alex advised that he is aware of the concern and has kept the Senators
apprised of
the
progress being made by the Budget Allocation Model Subcommittee of DBAC. He will be bringing
ideas to the Senate on how to increase the Senate’s profile and influence
in the budget
process. He will continue to provide information
and progress reports to the Senators.
VII. Old Business
A. Discuss
Senate’s Role re: Academic Directions Relative to New Facilities
Last
week, President Braun asked the Senators to consider how to organize the Senate
in order to provide input relative to the ongoing facility initiatives that
involve the renovation of the main building, construction of the new education
building, and the implications involved.
He stated that faculty members are driven by what is considered the
college’s academic direction – form follows structure. The Senate needs to decide the future
direction of the college. The
buildings need to be designed in a suitable form and decisions need to be made
within the next six months or else facilities will drive education.
The
Senators spoke to the issue at length. During discussion a question arose as to
who will ultimately make the decisions on construction issues. It was reported that some decisions,
particularly regarding the third floor remodel, were made some time ago. It has been promised that the architect
will consult faculty to determine their needs. A project manager is to be hired
and GAP will serve as the primary decision-making body for the college. It is
one of the Academic Senate’s responsibilities to provide advice on
academic and professional matters.
The Academic Senate can take its recommendations to GAP and integrate
those recommendations with others, keeping in mind that the Board of Trustees
has agreed to rely primarily on the advice of the Academic Senate.
Relative
to academic directions and facilities, it is important to consider the entire
community college system. Many
other community colleges are considering alternative delivery methods, whether
to focus on transfer, vocational education, under-represented groups, etc. It
was emphasized that the position of the college’s institutional research
analyst must be filled before anything can be done. It is important to consider the data on trends that will
necessarily effect the direction the college will take, and this will impact
the direction for a balance of curriculum. For example, stem cell research,
pharmacology, and biogenetic engineering are expected to be a major factor in
the resurgence of Silicon Valley.
The college needs to keep up the science departments.
It
was noted that students shop around to find the college that best suits their
needs and they attend various colleges to get through their programs. Statistics
from the National Communication Association’s Vol. 41, No. 2 Spectra publication were quoted as follows:
“Two-thirds
of community college students attend only part time, some try several colleges
at the same time, and nearly one in six students already has a bachelor’s
degree, according to the Community College Survey of Student Engagement. About 45% of students are first in
their family to attend college, 60% work more than 20 hours a week, 84% never
participate in extracurricular activities, 53% want to transfer to a four-year
school, and sadly, 45% predict financial burdens will cause them to drop out.
(USA Today, November 29, 2004)”
This
college should offer students all the classes they require for any given
program. This would help hire
faculty and attract students to the college. It would be a mistake to build and
not meet the needs of the students. The student representatives expressed their
appreciation for the Senate’s concerns relative to students. At a conference of student trustees,
Kellie remarked that most districts do not seem to care about their students
and build for money, not for the students.
It
was noted by the Student Representatives to the Senate that students are
concerned about the following issues, which they anticipate will be addressed
in the renovation of the main building:
1.
Heating and air conditioning in the
main building is a major issue and needs to be
addressed.
2. The desks currently used in the
classrooms are extremely uncomfortable, and this makes it
difficult for the students to focus on
learning. This does not provide an
incentive to return
to
the college.
3. There is a great need for smart classrooms.
4. Accessibility and student services
need to be addressed from the initial design of buildings.
5. Too few certificate programs are
offered and do not always correlate to a time factor. It would
be helpful for students to know exactly what classes and units will be
available at
what
time.
Other
concerns mentioned during discussion dealt with the campus facilities,
including furniture, as they relate to ADA. It is imperative that the architect keeps ADA guidelines in
mind. This institution is teaching adults, and the college must accommodate the
students’ needs as adults.
The existing square footage must be maintained, and the faculty needs to
be proactive and involved in how the square footage is to be utilized. It was
noted that the college has an Education and Facilities Master Plan that should
be brought into the discussions. It was emphasized that when decisions are
made, we must not lose sight of the long-term consequences and the “big
picture.” The college must
put more funds toward marketing.
Other community colleges in the area obviously have larger marketing
budgets given the advertising that is available from those colleges.
The
Academic Senate must have input to discussions on the direction of the
college. It was suggested that the
Academic Senate consult with campus and industry experts as to what is needed
and obtain their view on future trends in industry. Another suggestion was to hold open forums sponsored by the
Academic Senate before summer and provide the opportunity for faculty and staff
to have input before final decisions are made.
In
summary, in order for the Academic Senate to maintain an appropriate vigil, the
following documents and issues need to be considered:
• The Balance of Curriculum Document
•
The Educational &
Facility Master Plan document.
This is a central document that drives the programs and facilities for
the college
• Student Equity Plan – This
plan will have an impact on educational programs.
•
Establish a permanent link between
the group choosing the project manager and the Academic Senate via Jim
Burrell.
• Discuss
how to implement forums sponsored by the Academic Senate.
Alex asked the Senators to poll their constituents on what future trends they see in their discipline areas as far as education is concerned and be prepared to discuss the matter further at the next meeting.
VIII. New Business
A. Consider Purchase of Anti-plagiarism Software or
Service
This
item was postponed to a future Senate meeting.
B. Consider
Tenure Credit for Temporary Faculty Hired to Permanent Faculty Position
Senator
Kashima addressed the Senate on an issue that affects three faculty members at
Mission College and two faculty members at West Valley College, with specific
reference to language instructor Anna Brichko. These faculty members were hired as temporary full-time
faculty. Due to the hiring freeze,
they were not given the opportunity to hire on as permanent faculty. They were then hired as permanent
full-time faculty when the freeze was lifted and placed on tenure track. In nearly every case, when a temporary
hire becomes permanent, the first year of temporary work is credited towards
tenure. In these cases,
Human Resources, citing the Ed Code as the rationale for this decision, has
denied tenure credit because of a break in employment service. It was opined that the language in the
Ed Code does not prevent the district from granting tenure credit under such
conditions.
Since
these faculty were denied work due to the hiring freeze, causing a gap in their
service, the Academic Senate is being asked to bring this matter to the Board
of Trustees and request that a written policy be developed with regard to
tenure credit that protects those not hired for a second year because of an
action taken by the district. In addition, the Board should be asked to grant
the tenure credit to the referenced faculty members.
Discussion
ensued and several Senators indicated strong support to grant tenure credit to
all those involved, particularly for Anna Brichko, who was voted Teacher of the
Year by the students during her first year. It was pointed out that the March 2003 Board meeting
overflowed into the gym because the college community and the public turned out
to applaud new faculty receiving tenure, who were pink-slipped, and Anna
received the most commendations from the public. Tenure is a faculty prerogative, and although the Ed Code
governs tenure regulations, Human Resources cannot dictate those
regulations. The tenure process is
a collegial process determined by faculty and faculty has the right to endorse
this action. Alex explained that tenure is an overlapping responsibility of the
Academic Senate and ACE. He
indicated that he would like to develop a statement to read to the Board at the
March 17th Board meeting.
It
was stated that these upstanding and outstanding faculty members deserve the
support of the Academic Senate, and since their tenure review teams support
them as well and there is no cost to the district, the following motion was
passed unanimously (M/S – McKay/Smebye):
“that
the Mission College Academic Senate directs President Braun to place an item on
the agenda for the March 17, 2005, meeting of the Board of Trustees in support
of granting tenure credit to the three Mission College faculty members
mentioned.”
At this time, President
Braun announced that next week’s Senate meeting will be cancelled.
X. Correspondence,
Publications, & Announcements
1. Letter dated January 31, 2005, from
the Accrediting Commission including a report on the January 12-14, 2005,
Commission meeting.
2. Letter dated February 14, 2005,
from the Academic Senate for California Community Colleges Counseling &
Library Faculty Issues Committee regarding information on web-based counseling
standards and/or guidelines.
Publication/Minutes
1. The
approved minutes for the February 2, 2005, meeting of DBAC and the agenda for
the February 16,. 2005, meeting of DBAC.
2. The agenda for the February 17,
2005, meeting of the ACE Executive Council.
3. The February 10, 2005, issue of the
DVC FORUM from the Diablo Valley
College Faculty Senate.
4. The agenda for the February 17,
2005, meeting of the Board of Trustees.
5. The agenda for the February 17,
2005, meeting of the M-WV Land Corporation.
6. The approved summary notes for the
November 24th, and
December 8, 2004, meetings of GAP.
Announcements/Conferences
1. Staff
Development is accepting applications for mini-grants up to $200. The application deadline is March 7th. Contact Heather Rothenberg, Staff
Development Coordinator for additional information.
XI. Future
Agenda Items
No new items were presented at today’s meeting.
XII. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 4:00 p.m. (M/S/U – McKay/Cox). These minutes are respectfully submitted by Grace Hazán, Academic Senate Secretary.