MISSION COLLEGE
CURRICULUM
REVIEW COMITTEE
Summary
of Meeting – May 17, 2004
1. Call to Order – Dianne McKay called the
meeting to order at 2:15p.m.
|
Member |
P
|
A
|
Member |
P
|
A
|
|
Chairperson – D. McKay |
X |
|
Student
Dev.
– R. Sanchez |
|
X |
|
Commercial
Services
– S. Wisner |
X |
|
Technologies – M. Meyer |
X |
|
|
Applied
Sciences
– L. Zummo |
X |
|
Instruction
– H.
Robles |
|
X |
|
Communications
–
B. Ensminger |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
CATA
–
A. Szabados |
|
X |
Non-Voting
Members/Guests |
|
|
|
ESL
– K.
Dworak |
X |
|
Y.
Coleman, Articulation Officer |
X |
|
|
Math
–
K. Ting |
X |
|
A.
Braun, Academic Senate Pres. |
|
X |
|
Natural
Science – D.
McKay |
X |
|
|
|
|
|
Social
Science –
C. Moyers |
X |
|
|
|
|
2. Approval of Agenda
These notes are reflected in the minutes below. It was MSC (Dworak/Moyers) to approve
agenda.
3. Approval of Summary Minutes –
April 19, 2004
It was MSC
(Moyers/Zummo) to approve the summary minutes of April 19, 2004.
4. Course Approvals
a. New Courses – First Reading
None
b. New Courses – Second Reading
None
c. Revision of Courses
None
d. Administrative Changes
None
e. Inactivations
None
5.
Certificates/Degrees
a.
New
Certificates/Degrees
None
b.
Revision
to Certificates/Degrees
None
6. New Business
a. Honors
Program – Chris
Moyers passed out a draft of the Mission College Honors Program Guidelines to
the committee. CRC has the role to
look over the document and address questions/concerns about the honors
program. Issues discussed in the
meeting included the following:
· Are students required to do additional
work or take “special” courses for the honors program?
· Which courses are applicable to the
program?
· Will it include transfer courses only?
· How to indicate the honors courses?
· The transcript needs to indicate the
honors courses.
· Workload issues?
· Articulation concerns with the UC and the
consistency of the content.
· Need contract between the instructor and
student indicating the criteria.
Once CRC has decided on the needs/requirements for the
Honors Program, it will be forwarded to MC Academic Senate for approval.
b. Course
Revision Form Change –
All changes made on curriculum forms/manual will be submitted to MC Academic
Senate for approval.
c. ENGL*075
and BUS*078C –
Dianne McKay inform CRC the overlapping issue was brought to the MC Academic
Senate for discussion. CRC decided
unanimously that if Academic Senate wants to be involved, their role is to
question how the process took place and not the final outcome decided by
CRC. It was pointed out that the
issue between ENGL*075 and BUS*078C spanned over a 3-week period, where both
sides were given many opportunities to address there case and concerns. This overlapping discussion was
redundant and should have not be brought to the MC Academic Senate.
7. Old
Business
a. HBA
Recommendation Guidelines and Representative to Districtwide Taskforce – A taskforce needs to be establish to
address the HBA issue and indicate the details of how, when, where, etc. HBA
are applicable.
b. AP
Chart – Yolanda
Coleman presented an updated list and stated it has been brought to the
Division Chair Council for approval.
The next step is to place it on the agenda for MC Academic Senate.
8. Future Agenda
a. Pre/Co-Requisite Datatel Colleague Issue
b. Review Course Overlap Policy
9. Adjournment
Meeting was adjourned at
3:45 p.m.